Unfortunately, back then KDE was going through some major changes (KDE 4.0), which added to the questionable stability of Kubuntu itself made the whole experience frustrating and disappointing. Initially, I thought it could be down to my lack of understanding of KDE, or perhaps that I didn't install Kubuntu correctly. After reading many forum posts, though, I quickly realized that most people agreed that Kubuntu was not a good implementation of the KDE desktop. The average reply was recommending other alternatives, such as OpenSUSE, Mandriva, PCLinuxOS, etc.
After such a disappointing first encounter, Kubuntu became a distro to forget for me, and it was not until a few days ago that I felt I should give it another try.
FIRST CONTACT
After taking a look at the OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT, I have to admit I was impressed with some of the features listed there. I downloaded the ISO and proceeded to test the standard installation.
INSTALLATION
Plain and simple, Kubuntu 10.10 has one the best installation (along with Pardus and OpenSUSE) wizards I have seen in a KDE distro. There is an undeniable resemblance to the one in Ubuntu 10.10, but with a nice KDE flavor throughout. Here's a few screenshots to showcase what the Kubuntu installation process looks like.
Click on image to enlarge
As can be seen below, the Kubuntu 10.10 installation process includes many of the features that made their debut on Ubuntu 10.10, such as providing users with useful recommendations before the installation starts.
Click on image to enlarge
Click on image to enlarge
Disk partition management is clear and simple, and so are setting the time zone and selecting the keyboard layout.
Click on image to enlarge
Click on image to enlarge
Click on image to enlarge
ReKonq is the web browser of choice for Kubuntu 10.10. I believe it is will be short lived in most Kubuntu installations, though, as it simply cannot compete with some of the most popular alternatives out there, like Firefox, Google Chrome, Chromium or even Opera.
Click on image to enlarge
All in all, the Kubuntu installation process is great. Highly informational and intuitive, it should make installation a piece of cake for most users, even those with little Linux experience.
DESKTOP AND APPLICATIONS
Kubuntu 10.10 sports KDE SC 4.5.1 and up to date compilations of many KDE applications, including Amarok, Kmail, etc. Leaving all that's common to most KDE distros aside, the most notable application in Kubuntu 10.10 is probably the much improved KPackageKit, a software manager with an easy to use interface.
Click on image to enlarge
Ubuntu users will probably recognize the influence of their distro's own software center, at least visually. Unfortunately, KPackageKit is still not there in many areas, but it is a definite improvement over other software managers I have seen in other KDE distros. For example, PCLinuxOS is still using (what looks like ancient software at this stage) Synaptic.
Click on image to enlarge
Searching applications is simple and intuitive, and queuing installations is truly possible, in a way that reminds me of Synaptic. As is the case with many of the latest software managers, users can browse by category or perform a text search. Double clicking on the package entry will display a description on the panel below including a screenshot, if available. In addition, managing software sources is also simple with KPackageKit.
Click on image to enlarge
Kubuntu also includes its own "Message indicator" system tray applet, which is compatible with Kopete and Pidgin (probably compatible with other instant messaging packages, but I haven't tested any others).
BLUETOOTH AND NETWORKING
When it comes to KDE distros, I almost exclusively use PCLinuxOS, which does inherit certain elements from Mandriva. One of those elements is the network manager, which does many things very well, but it also has its share of flaws.
In my experience, the most annoying thing is that it cannot automatically connect to several wireless network connections. In other words, if a machine is connected to wireless network A and it is "moved" to wireless network B, it will not connect automatically. The user is then forced to manually manage that connection. After that, repeating connections to wireless network B will happen automatically, but the problem will happen again when "moving" back to wireless network A.
Another element that I find annoying is that the PCLinuxOS network manager is quite slow in general (starting up the application, browsing wireless connections available, rescanning, or simply connecting). Last but not least, it's interface is a complete departure from KDE's, so it feels alien and a bit obsolete.
On the other hand, Kubuntu uses the KDE network manager, which in my testing showed superb performance and very nice features. It is seamlessly integrated on the system tray and within the plasma desktop, providing all the relevant information in a quick and non intrusive way.
In addition, it allows users to drill down on the connection in use for further details. When that happens, a small chart displaying the current activity of the connection is displayed. A great feature, if you ask me.
On a different note, Kubuntu sports a fully working BlueDevil implementation, which is very much welcome. Among other things, it allowed me (for the first time in a KDE distro) to successfully configure my mobile phone, making browsing the device and sending files to it as quick and simple as is usually the case in GNOME desktops.
BUGGY AND UNSTABLE?
Unfortunately, while there are many reasons to congratulate Kubuntu developers for this latest release, there are still things that feel somewhat sloppy and buggy. For example, users who want to use Compiz and Emerald, will be forced to use a small hack that enables both at the beginning of every session.
Another thing that feels buggy is font rendering. As part of the default installation, Kubuntu uses the new Ubuntu fonts, which do look great. However, according to my testing in two different machines, font rendering starts to behave strangely as soon as size or font type is changed. Even after setting all parameters back to their original values, fonts still don't look as they did after the installation. Very very strange.
WORTH A SHOT?
Kubuntu 10.10 is a more solid and overall better version of this popular distro. There are still certain areas that require some definite polishing and I wouldn't place it up there with the best KDE distros available. Having said so, users who can live with the few workarounds required to get Kubuntu 10.10 to work 100% should enjoy a number of features that are hard to find in other KDE distros.
In my opinion, Kubuntu 10.10 is worth a shot, specially if you appreciate the Ubuntu influence. For those who couldn't care less about it and/or require top stability, it may be wise looking somewhere else.
0 comments:
Post a Comment